in the light of recent LHCb data
Menu:
Reference |
Scenario I |
Scenario II |
Scenario III |
Scenario IV |
Some of the plots below come from the following paper:
This update includes the results up to the end of 2011, including the CDF [arXiv:1112.1726] and LHCb [arXiv:1112.3183] results on (φs,ΔΓs) from Bs->J/Ψ Φ. It corresponds to the first version of arXiv:1203.0238. |
In scenario I we have introduced NP in
M12q = M12SM,qΔq independently for Bd, Bs and K, corresponding to NP with arbitrary flavour structure.
Constraint for Bd mixing: |
|
|
Constraint for Bs mixing: and Im Δs=-0.04+0.17-0.17. |
|
|
Indirect constraint on the asymmetry ASL=(-15.5+14.3-5.9)10-4 compared with the direct measurements of CDF and D0. |
|
|
Indirect constraint on the CP phase φsJ/Ψ Φ=-123.9+9.0-13.6ˆ or -61.8+13.4-8.9ˆ compared with the direct measurements of CDF, D0 and LHCb. |
|
In scenario II we have introduced NP in M12q = M12SM,qΔq with Minimal Flavour Violation (MFV) with small bottom Yukawa coupling yielding Δd=Δs=Δ real. Constraint for neutral meson mixing Δ=0.895+.069-0.063. |
|
In scenario III we have introduced NP in
M12q = M12SM,qΔq with Minimal Flavour Violation (MFV) with large bottom Yukawa coupling
yielding Δd=Δs=Δ complex.
Constraint for Bd and Bs mixings: |
|
In order to accomodate the measurements of φs and ASL, we introduce a fourth scenario with NP occurring not only in M12q, but also Gamma;12q. We introduce the new parameters
|
||
Constraint for Im(δd) and Im(δs) with the 68% CL intervals Im(δd)=0.92+1.11-0.69 and Im(δs)=1.2+1.6-1.0. The p-value for the 2D SM hypothesis Im(δd)= Im(δdSM) and Im(δs)= Im(δsSM) is 3.2 σ. |
|
|
Constraint for Re(δs) and Im(δs). The p-value for the SM hypothesis δd,s= δd,sSM and Δd=Δs=1 is 2.8 σ. |
|