(ICHEP 2018 conference)
Menu:
The results of the global CKM analysis include:

Numerical Results 
Pulls for various inputs or parameters involved in the Standard Model global fit. Each pull (in units of σ) is computed by taking the square root of the difference between χ^{2}_{min} obtained including or not including direct information on the quantity. This corresponds to consider Δχ^{2}_{X;min}=χ^{2}_{with data on X;min} χ^{2}_{without data X;min} as a random variable distributed with 1 degree of freedom, and reinterpret the probability of reaching the observed value in units of σ. The presence of a plateau in the Rfit model for systematic uncertainties may lead to a vanishing pull for some quantities even in cases where the predicted and observed values are not identical. Some of the pulls presented in this plot are correlated [this is for instance the case for sin 2β and Br(B→τν)]. 
The global CKM fit in the large (ρbar,ηbar) plane:
Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. The V_{ub} constraint has been split in three contributions: V_{ub} from inclusive and exclusive semileptonic B decays (plain dark green), V_{ub} from B^{+}→τ^{+} ν (hashed darker green), and V_{ub}/V_{cb} from Λ_{b} decays (hashed ligher green). The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane using only exclusive determinations of V_{ub} and V_{cb} from semileptonic B decays as inputs. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane using only inclusive determinations of V_{ub} and V_{cb} from semileptonic B decays as inputs. 

The global CKM fit in the small (ρbar,ηbar) plane (zoom):
Zoomed constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane.The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Zoomed constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. The V_{ub} constraint has been split in three contributions: V_{ub} from inclusive and exclusive semileptonic B decays (plain dark green), V_{ub} from B^{+}→τ^{+} ν (hashed darker green), and V_{ub}/V_{cb} from Λ_{b} decays (hashed ligher green). The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Zoomed constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane not including the angle measurements in the global fit. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane including only the angle measurements. 


Constraints from CP conserving quantities (V_{ub} / V_{cb}, Δm_{d}, (Δm_{d} and Δm_{s}) and B^{+} →τ^{+} ν) in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. 


Constraints from CP violating quantities (sin(2β), α, γ and ε_{k}) in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane (involving γ(DK) and α from the isospin analysis with the help of sin2β (charmonium), which gives another tree only γ measurement (the only assumption is that the ΔI=3/2 b>d EW penguin amplitude is negligible)). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane (involving γ(DK) and α from the isospin analysis with the help of sin2β (charmonium), which gives another tree only γ measurement (the only assumption is that the ΔI=3/2 b>d EW penguin amplitude is negligible)). The constraints from γ(DK) and γ(α)=παβ are shown. 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane, with only input on V_{ub} from semileptonic decays (involving γ(DK) and α from the isospin analysis with the help of sin2β (charmonium), which gives another tree only γ measurement (the only assumption is that the ΔI=3/2 b>d EW penguin amplitude is negligible)). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane (only γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane with only input on V_{ub} from semileptonic decays (ony γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane with only input on V_{ub} from exclusive semileptonic B decays (only γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane with only input on V_{ub} from inclusive semileptonic B decays (only γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Loop" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane, not including the braching ratio of B^{+} → τ^{+}ν in the global fit. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane not including the measurement of sin2β in the global fit. 

The global CKM fit in the large (ρ̅_{M}, η̅_{M}) plane
with M = sb, ds, ct, ut, uc:
The constraints can be expressed in the unitarity triangles associated with the different mesons of interest, with the relative coordinates of the upper appex of each triangle defined as 
Constraints in the (ρ̅_{sb}, η̅_{sb}) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅_{ds}, η̅_{ds}) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅_{tc}, η̅_{tc}) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅_{tu}, η̅_{tu}) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅_{cu}, η̅_{cu}) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 

The global CKM fit in the (V_{ud},V_{us}) plane:
Constraints in the (V_{ud},V_{us}) plane. The indirect constraints (coming from b transitions) are related to V_{ud} and V_{us} through unitarity. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL.  
Prediction for the normalisation of the vector form factor F^{K→π}_{+}(0), compared to our current average of lattice resuls.  
The global CKM fit in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane:
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane. The indirect constraints (combing from b and s transitions) are related to V_{cd} and V_{cs} through unitarity. The direct constraints combine leptonic and semileptonic D and D_{s} decays as well as information from neutrinonucleaon scattering and W → cs decays. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only leptonic D and D_{s} decays with our inputs for lattice averages for f_{D} and f_{Ds}.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only semileptonic D and D_{s} decays with our inputs for lattice averages F_{D → π}(0) and F_{D → K }(0).  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only information from neutrinonucleaon scattering and W→ cs decays (no lattice input). 
The global CKM fit in the (V_{ub},V_{cb}) plane:
Constraints in the (V_{ub},V_{cb}) plane.
The horizontal and vertical coloured bands represent our average of the determinations from semileptonic B decays.
The white bands with solid (dashed) borders correspond to the determination
from exclusive (inclusive) semileptonic B decays.
The diagonal coloured band corresponds to the determination of
V_{ub}/V_{cb} from Λ_{b} decays.
The rainbow oval region indicates the indirect determination of V_{ub} and V_{cb} from the global fit, without any information from semileptonic or leptonic decays of bhadrons. 

Constraints on V_{ub} from inclusive and exclusive B decays, as well as our average, compared to the indirect determination from the global fit.  
Constraints on V_{cb} from inclusive and exclusive B decays, as well as our average, compared to the indirect determination from the global fit. 
The global CKM fit for V_{td} and V_{ts}:
Constraint on V_{td}/V_{ts} from the global fit, using only information on B_{d} and B_{s} mixings, and using only treelevel quantities. In all three cases, we use our average of lattice inputs.  
Constraint on V_{td}/V_{ts} from the global fit, using only information on B_{d} and B_{s} mixings, and using only treelevel quantities. We use our average of lattice inputs apart from the bag parameters for B_{d} and B_{s} mixings which are taken from FNALMILC 2016 with a linear combination of uncertainties (linked to the Rfit approach). For the fit using neutralmeson mixing only, we also provide the results using a quadratic combination (Gaussian approach). A discrepancy occurs only in the latter case.  
Constraint on V_{td} from the global fit, using only information on B_{d} and B_{s} mixings, and using only treelevel quantities. In all three cases, we use our average of lattice inputs.  
Constraint on V_{td} from the global fit, using only information on B_{d} and B_{s} mixings, and using only treelevel quantities. We use our average of lattice inputs apart from the bag parameters for B_{d} and B_{s} mixings which are taken from FNALMILC 2016 with a linear combination of uncertainties (linked to the Rfit approach). For the fit using neutralmeson mixing only, we also provide the results using a quadratic combination (Gaussian approach). A discrepancy occurs only in the latter case.  
Constraint on V_{ts} from the global fit, using only information on B_{d} and B_{s} mixings, and using only treelevel quantities. In all three cases, we use our average of lattice inputs.  
Constraint on V_{ts} from the global fit, using only information on B_{d} and B_{s} mixings, and using only treelevel quantities. We use our average of lattice inputs apart from the bag parameters for B_{d} and B_{s} mixings which are taken from FNALMILC 2016 with a linear combination of uncertainties (linked to the Rfit approach). For the fit using neutralmeson mixing only, we also provide the results using a quadratic combination (Gaussian approach). A discrepancy occurs only in the latter case. 
Branching ratio of B_{s}→μ^{+} μ^{}
Prediction for Br(B_{s}→μ^{+} μ^{}) to be compared with the current measurement (we consider here the branching ratio at t=0, not including effects due to B_{s} mixing).  
Prediction for Br(B_{d}→μ^{+} μ^{}) to be compared with the current measurement.  
Prediction on the two dileptonic branching ratios Br(B_{s}→μ^{+} μ^{}) and Br(B_{d}→μ^{+} μ^{}) coming from the global fit (without input on dileptonic branching ratios) compared to current experimental information. 
Constraints on the angle α/ϕ_{2} from charmless B decays:
Constraints on α/ϕ_{2} from B→ππ (BABAR, Belle and WA)
compared to the prediction from the global CKM fit (not including the αrelated measurements). 


Constraints on α/ϕ_{2} from B→ππ, ρπ and ρρ (WA) compared to the prediction from the global CKM fit (not including the αrelated measurements). 


Constraint on the reduced isospin amplitude a^{+−} = A^{+−}/A^{+0} in the complex plane for the B→ππsystem. The individual constraint from the B^{0}→π^{+}π^{} system and from the B^{0}→π^{0}π^{0} observables are indicated by the yellow and green circular areas, respectively. The corresponding isospin triangular relation is represented by the black triangle.  
Constraint on the reduced isospin amplitude a^{+−} = A^{+−}/A^{+0} in the complex plane for the B→ππsystem. The individual constraint from the B^{0}→π^{+}π^{} system and from the B^{0}→π^{0}π^{0} observables are indicated by the yellow and green circular areas, respectively. The corresponding isospin triangular relation is represented by the black triangle. 