(CKM 2014 conference)
Menu:
The results of the global CKM analysis include:

Numerical Results 
Pulls for various inputs or parameters involved in the Standard Model global fit.
Each pull (in units of σ) is computed by taking the square root of the difference between
χ^{2}_{min} obtained including or not including direct information on the quantity. This corresponds to consider
Δχ^{2}_{X;min}=χ^{2}_{with data on X;min}
χ^{2}_{without data X;min} as a random variable distributed with
1 degree of freedom, and reinterpret the probability of reaching the observed value in units of σ. The presence of a plateau in the Rfit model for theoretical uncertainties may lead to a vanishing pull for some quantities even in cases where the predicted and observed values are not identical. Many of the pulls presented in this plot are correlated [this is for instance the case for sin 2β and Br(B→τν)], so that the distribution of the corresponding pvalues should not be expected to be flat 
The global CKM fit in the large (ρ̅, η̅) plane:
Constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane. The V_{ub} constraint has been splitted in the two contributions: Vub from inclusive and exclusive semileptonic decays (plain dark green) and Vub from B^{+}→τ^{+} ν (hashed green). The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane using only exclusive determinations of Vub and Vcb from semileptonic decays as inputs. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane using only inclusive determinations of Vub and Vcb from semileptonic decays as inputs. 

The global CKM fit in the small (ρ̅, η̅) plane (zoom):
Zoomed constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane.The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Zoomed constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane. The V_{ub} constraint has been splitted in the two contributions: V_{ub} from inclusive and exclusive semileptonic decays (plain dark green) and V_{ub} from B^{+}→τ^{+} ν (hashed green). The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Zoomed constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane not including the angle measurements in the global fit. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane including only the angle measurements. 


Constraints from CP conserving quantities (V_{ub} / V_{cb}, Δm_{d}, (Δm_{d} and Δm_{s}) and B^{+} →τ^{+} ν) in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane. 


Constraints from CP violating quantities (sin(2β), α, γ and ε_{k}) in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane. 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane (involving γ(DK) and α from the isospin analysis with the help of sin2β (charmonium), which gives another tree only γ measurement (the only assumption is that the ΔI=3/2 b>d EW penguin amplitude is negligible)). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane (only γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane with only input on V_{ub} from semileptonic decays (ony γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane with only input on V_{ub} from exclusive semileptonic decays (only γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane with only input on V_{ub} from inclusive semileptonic decays (only γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Loop" quantities in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane, not including the braching ratio of B^{+} → τ^{+}ν in the global fit. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane not including the measurement of sin2β in the global fit. 

The global CKM fit in the large (ρ̅_{M}, η̅_{M}) plane
with
M = sb, ds, ct, ut, uc:
The constraints can be expressed in the unitarity triangles associated with the different mesons of interest, with the relative coordinates of the upper appex of each triangle defined as 
Constraints in the (ρ̅_{sb}, η̅_{sb}) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. The constraint from the angle φ_{s} related to B_{s} meson mixing is indicated with light blue lines. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅_{ds}, η̅_{ds}) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅_{tc}, η̅_{tc}) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅_{tu}, η̅_{tu}) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρ̅_{cu}, η̅_{cu}) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 

Constraint from the B^{+}→τ^{+} ν branching ratio:
There is a specific correlation between sin2β and BR(B→τν), regarding the prediction from the global fit without using these measurements. The cross corresponds to the experimental value with 1 sigma errors. The discrepancy between prediction and measurement is 1.6 σ.  
The constraint can also be seen from the point of view of lattice inputs, with the predictions on the decay constant f_{Bd} and f_{Bd} Sqrt[B_{Bd}] 
New physics in neutralmeson mixing:
Individual constraints correspond to 68% CL
(see: arXiv:1008.1593 [hepph] and
arXiv:1203.0238. [hepph] for a detailed
explanation of the hypotheses). The DO result for the dimuon asymmetry A_{SL} has been recently corrected to take into SM contributions neglected beforehand (standard model CP violation in interference of decays with and without mixing of B<0$ to flavour nonspecific states), based on arXiv:1303.0175 [hepex]. This estimate was later criticised in Uli Nierste's talk at CKM14 as being too large a correction. In order to take into account an underestimation of the systematics attached to this estimate, we consider the results both with and without including A_{SL} in the fit. 
In scenario I, we have introduced NP in
M_{12}^{q} = M_{12}^{SM,q}Δ_{q} independently for B_{d}, B_{s} and K, corresponding to NP with arbitrary flavour structure. In the absence of A_{SL}, constraints on New Physics in the (ReΔ_{d},ImΔ_{d}) plane. A 0.9 σ deviation is obtained for the 2dimensional SM hypothesis Δ_{d} = 1 (Re(Δ_{d})=1, Im(Δ_{d})=0). 

In the absence of A_{SL}, constraints on New Physics in the (ReΔ_{s},ImΔ_{s}) plane.
A 0.3 σ deviation is obtained for the 2dimensional SM hypothesis Δ_{s} = 1
(Re(Δ_{s})=1, Im(Δ_{s})=0).
The pulls for the relevant observables are 1.1 σ for B>τν and 1.1 σ for φ_{s}^{J/Ψ Φ}. 
In the presence of A_{SL}, constraints on New Physics in the (ReΔ_{d},ImΔ_{d}) plane. A 1.2 σ deviation is obtained for the 2dimensional SM hypothesis Δ_{d} = 1 (Re(Δ_{d})=1, Im(Δ_{d})=0).  
In the presence of A_{SL}, constraints on New Physics in the (ReΔ_{s},ImΔ_{s}) plane.
A 0.3 σ deviation is obtained for the 2dimensional SM hypothesis Δ_{s} = 1
(Re(Δ_{s})=1, Im(Δ_{s})=0).
The pulls for the relevant observables are 0.2 σ for B>τν, 2.6 σ for φ_{s}^{J/Ψ Φ} and 2.4 σ for A_{SL}. 
Branching ratio of B_{s}→μ^{+} μ^{}
Prediction for Br(B_{s}→μ^{+} μ^{})=(3.34^{+0.13}_{0.25})x10^{9}, to be compared with the current measurement (2.8^{+0.7}_{0.6})x10^{9}.  
Prediction on the two dileptonic branching ratios Br(B_{s}→μ^{+} μ^{})
and Br(B_{d}→μ^{+} μ^{}) coming from the global fit
(without input on dileptonic branching ratios) compared to current experimental information. In both plots, we consider the value of the branching ratios without time integration, which would induce a further increase of O(ΔΓ_{s}/Γ_{s}), more precisely (1+y_{s})=1.07. 
The global CKM fit in the (V_{ud},V_{us}) plane:
Constraints in the (V_{ud},V_{us}) plane. The indirect constraints (coming from b transitions) are related to V_{ud} and V_{us} through unitarity. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 
The global CKM fit in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane:
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane. The indirect constraints (combing from b and s transitions) are related to V_{cd} and V_{cs} through unitarity. The direct constraints combine leptonic and semileptonic D and D_{s} decays as well as information from neutrinonucleaon scattering and W → cs decays. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only leptonic D and D_{s} decays with our inputs for lattice averages f_{Ds}=245.3 ± 0.5 ± 4.5 MeV and f_{Ds}/f_{D}=1.201 ± 0.004 ± 0.010.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only semileptonic D and D_{s} decays with our inputs for lattice averages F_{D → π}(0)=0.666 ± 0.020 ± 0.048 and F_{D → K }(0)=0.747 ± 0.011 ± 0.034.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only information from neutrinonucleaon scattering and W→ cs decays (no lattice input). 
Constraints on the angle α/ϕ_{2} from charmless B decays:
Constraints on α/ϕ_{2} from B→ππ, ρπ and ρρ (WA)



Constraints on α/ϕ_{2} from the combination of B→ππ, ρπ, and ρρ for BaBar, Belle and WA,
compared to the prediction from the global CKM fit (not including the αrelated measurements). 


Isospin triangles in B→ππ and B→ππ. One notices that the first triangle is flat, contrary to the second. 

Constraints on the angle γ/ϕ_{3} from B decays to charm :
Constraints on γ/ϕ_{3} from world average D^{(*)}K^{(*)} decays
(GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ): γ[combined] =
(73.2^{+6.3}_{7.0})°, compared to the prediction from the global
CKM fit (not including these measurements): γ[fit] = (66.9^{+1.0}_{3.7})° 

Constraints on γ/ϕ_{3} from different set of measurements on D^{(*)}K^{(*)} decays
(GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ) (methods shown separately):



Constraints on (r_{B}(DK) vs γ) and (δ_{B}(DK) vs γ): 

Constraint on the ratios of interfering amplitudes r_{B} and the strong phases between the interfering amplitudes of the different decays B → D^{(*)}K^{(*)} using GLW, ADS and GGSZ results from these decays: 











Constraints on sin(2β+γ) from the measurement of timedependent CP asymmetries in D^{(*)} π (ρ).  
Translation of this result into γ (using sin(2β) as additional input and choosing
among the four solutions to the SM one). γ[GLW+ADS+GGSZ+sin(2β+γ)] = (73.3^{+6.1}_{6.5})°. 

Constraints from sin(2β+γ) in the (ρ̅, η̅) plane. 