(Moriond 2014 conference)
Menu:
The results of the global CKM analysis include:

Numerical Results 
Pulls for various inputs or parameters involved in the Standard Model global fit.
Each pull (in units of σ) is computed by taking the square root of the difference between
χ^{2}_{min} obtained including or not including direct information on the quantity. This corresponds to consider
Δχ^{2}_{X;min}=χ^{2}_{with data on X;min}
χ^{2}_{without data X;min} as a random variable distributed with
1 degree of freedom, and reinterpret the probability of reaching the observed value in units of σ. The presence of a plateau in the Rfit model for theoretical uncertainties may lead to a vanishing pull for some quantities even in cases where the predicted and observed values are not identical. Many of the pulls presented in this plot are correlated [this is for instance the case for sin 2β and Br(B→τν)], so that the distribution of the corresponding pvalues should not be expected to be flat 
The global CKM fit in the large (ρbar,ηbar) plane:
Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. The V_{ub} constraint has been splitted in the two contributions: Vub from inclusive and exclusive semileptonic decays (plain dark green) and Vub from B^{+}→τ^{+} ν (hashed green). The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 

The global CKM fit in the small (ρbar,ηbar) plane (zoom):
Zoomed constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane.The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Zoomed constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. The V_{ub} constraint has been splitted in the two contributions: V_{ub} from inclusive and exclusive semileptonic decays (plain dark green) and V_{ub} from B^{+}→τ^{+} ν (hashed green). The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Zoomed constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane not including the angle measurements in the global fit. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane including only the angle measurements. 


Constraints from CP conserving quantities (V_{ub} / V_{cb}, Δm_{d}, (Δm_{d} and Δm_{s}) and B^{+} →τ^{+} ν) in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. 


Constraints from CP violating quantities (sin(2β), α, γ and ε_{k}) in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane (involving γ(DK) and α from the isospin analysis with the help of sin2β (charmonium), which gives another tree only γ measurement (the only assumption is that the ΔI=3/2 b>d EW penguin amplitude is negligible)). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane (only γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane with only input on V_{ub} from semileptonic decays (ony γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane with only input on V_{ub} from exclusive semileptonic decays (only γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane with only input on V_{ub} from inclusive semileptonic decays (only γ(DK) is used). 


Constraints from "Loop" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane, not including the braching ratio of B^{+} → τ^{+}ν in the global fit. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane not including the measurement of sin2β in the global fit. 

The global CKM fit in the large (ρ_{s}bar,η_{s}bar) plane:
Constraints in the (ρ_{s}bar,η_{s}bar) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 

Constraint from the B^{+}→τ^{+} ν branching ratio:
There is a specific correlation between sin2β and BR(B→τν), regarding the prediction from the global fit without using these measurements. The cross corresponds to the experimental value with 1 sigma errors.  
The constraint can also be seen from the point of view of lattice inputs, with the predictions on the decay constant f_{Bd} and f_{Bd} Sqrt[B_{Bd}] 
The global CKM fit in the (V_{ud},V_{us}) plane:
Constraints in the (V_{ud},V_{us}) plane. The indirect constraints (coming from b transitions) are related to V_{ud} and V_{us} through unitarity. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 
The global CKM fit in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane:
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane. The indirect constraints (combing from b and s transitions) are related to V_{cd} and V_{cs} through unitarity. The direct constraints combine leptonic and semileptonic D and D_{s} decays as well as information from neutrinonucleaon scattering and W → cs decays. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only leptonic D and D_{s} decays with our inputs for lattice averages f_{D}=249.2 ± 1.2 ± 4.5 MeV and f_{Ds}/f_{D}=1.185 ± 0.005 ± 0.010.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only semileptonic D and D_{s} decays with our inputs for lattice averages F_{D → π}(0)=0.666 ± 0.017 ± 0.048 and F_{D → K }(0)=0.747 ± 0.010 ± 0.034.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only information from neutrinonucleaon scattering and W→ cs decays (no lattice input). 
Constraints on the angle γ/ϕ_{3} from B decays to charm :
Constraints on γ/ϕ_{3} from world average D(*)K(*) decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ): γ[combined] = 70.0^{+7.7}_{9.0}°, compared to the prediction from the global CKM fit (not including these measurements): γ[fit] = 66.4^{+1.2}_{3.3}°  
Constraints on γ/ϕ_{3} from all measurements on D(*)K(*) decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ) (methods shown separately): γ[combined] = 70.0^{+7.7}_{9.0}°  
Constraints on γ/ϕ_{3} from BaBar measurements on D(*)K(*) decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ) (methods shown separately): γ[BaBar] = 72^{+17}_{19}°  
Constraints on γ/ϕ_{3} from Belle measurements on D(*)K(*) decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ) (methods shown separately): γBelle] = 73^{+13}_{15}°  
Constraints on γ/ϕ_{3} from LHCb measurements on D(*)K(*) decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ) (methods shown separately):: γ[LHCb] = 68^{+12}_{15}° 
Constraint on the ratio of interfering amplitudes r_{B} of the decay B → DK from world average D(*)K(*) decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ): r_{B}(DK) = 0.0972^{+0.0063}_{0.0064 }.  
Constraint on the ratio of amplitudes r_{B} of the decay B → D^{*}K: r_{B}(D^{*}K) =0.120^{+0.018}_{0.020}.  
Constraint on the ratio of amplitudes r_{B} of the decay B → DK^{*}: r_{B}(DK^{*}) = 0.137^{+0.045}_{0.047}.  
Constraint on the strong phase between the interfering amplitudes of the decay B → DK from world average D(*)K(*) decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ): δ_{B}(DK) = 121.1^{+8.2}_{9.3}°.  
Constraint on the strong phase between the interfering amplitudes of the decay B → D^{*}K: δ_{B}(D^{*}K) = 50^{+13}_{15}°.  
Constraint on the strong phase between the interfering amplitudes of the decay B → DK^{*}: δ_{B}(DK^{*}) = 107^{+35}_{42}°. 