(FPCP 2013 conference)
Menu:
The results of the global CKM analysis include:

Numerical Results 
The global CKM fit in the large (ρbar,ηbar) plane:
Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. The V_{ub} constraint has been splitted in the two contributions: Vub from inclusive and exclusive semileptonic decays (plain dark green) and Vub from B^{+}→τ^{+} ν (hashed green). The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 

Constraints on the angle α/ϕ_{2} from charmless B decays:
Constraints on α/ϕ_{2} from B→ρπ (BABAR, Belle and WA),
with compared to the prediction from the global CKM fit (not including the αrelated measurements) 


Constraints on α/ϕ_{2} from the combination of B→ππ, ρπ, and ρρ for BABAR, Belle and WA,
with compared to the prediction from the global CKM fit (not including the αrelated measurements). 


Constraints on α/ϕ_{2} from B→ππ, ρπ and ρρ (WA) compared to the prediction from the global CKM fit (not including the αrelated measurements). 

Constraints on the angle γ/ϕ_{3} from B decays to charm:
The references of the observables from charged B → D^{(*)}K^{(*)} decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ) from BaBar, Belle, LHCb are included in the summary of inputs and results file  
We also use the inputs from charm (combining observables from charm mixing, CPV and ψ(3770) results):


Constraints on γ combining results from
D^{(*)}K^{(*)} decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses
(GGSZ) from BaBar, Belle, LHCb and world average : compared to the prediction from the global CKM fit (not including these measurements): γ[fit] = (69.7^{+1.3}_{2.8})° 

Constraints on γ from world average
D^{(*)}K^{(*)} decays
(GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ) (methods shown separately):


Constraint on the ratio of interfering amplitudes r_{B}
of the decay B → DK from world average
D^{(*)}K^{(*)} decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz
analyses (GGSZ):



Constraint on the strong phase between the interfering
amplitudes of the decay B → DK from world average
D^{(*)}K^{(*)} decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz
analyses (GGSZ):


Illustration of the correlation between the determination of γ and the ratio of interfering amplitudes r_{B} (the strong phase difference δ_{B}) of the decay B → DK from world average D^{(*)}K^{(*)} decays (GLW+ADS) and Dalitz analyses (GGSZ). 


Same using only Babar inputs. 


Same using only Belle inputs. 


Same using only LHCb inputs. 

Illustrations of the correlation between the determination of γ determined with the GLW+ADS observables and the strong phase difference δ_{D} for BaBar, Belle, LHCb and all experiments combined. 


Comparison of the strong phase δ_{D}(Kπ) obtained from charm inputs (green dotted), from GLW+ADS observables (blue) and from GLW+ADS+GGSZ observables (red) 
New physics in neutralmeson Mixing:
Individual constraints correspond to 68% CL
(see: arXiv:1008.1593 [hepph] and
arXiv:1203.0238 [hepph] for a detailed
explanation of the hypotheses). Numerical inputs, results and confidence intervals are given in the detailed discussion of inputs and results. 
In scenario I we have introduced NP in
M_{12}^{q} = M_{12}^{SM,q}Δ_{q} independently for B_{d}, B_{s} and K, corresponding to NP with arbitrary flavour structure. Constraints on New Physics in the (ReΔ_{d},ImΔ_{d}) plane. A 1.5 σ deviation is obtained for the 2dimensional SM hypothesis Δ_{d} = 1 (Re(Δ_{d})=1, Im(Δ_{d})=0). 

Constraints on New Physics in the (ReΔ_{s},ImΔ_{s}) plane.
A 0.0 σ deviation is obtained for the 2dimensional SM hypothesis Δ_{s} = 1
(Re(Δ_{s})=1, Im(Δ_{s})=0).
The pulls for the relevant observables are 0.2 σ for B>τν, 2.9 σ for φ_{s}^{J/Ψ Φ} and 3.4 σ for A_{SL}, illustrating the difficulty to accomodate the last two results in this scenario. 
Branching ratio of B_{s}→μ^{+} μ^{}
Prediction for Br(B_{s}→μ^{+} μ^{})=(3.63^{+0.21}_{0.34})x10^{9}. The blue (respectively red) curve represents the prediction removing the input from Δ m_{s} (respectively f_{Bs}). The red curve is actually identical to the green one, indicating that the prediction is dominated by the indirect determination of f_{Bs} through the global fit (more specifically Δm_{s}), and not by its direct input. 
The global CKM fit in the (V_{ud},V_{us}) plane:
Constraints in the (V_{ud},V_{us}) plane. The indirect constraints (coming from b transitions) are related to V_{ud} and V_{us} through unitarity. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL.  
The accuracy recently reached by kaon leptonic decays K→eν and K→μν requires the inclusion of the full set of universal radiative corrections described in MarcianoSirlin 1993. The agreement is then very good between the measurements and the prediction of the global fit without these observables. 
The global CKM fit in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane:
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane. The indirect constraints (combing from b and s transitions) are related to V_{cd} and V_{cs} through unitarity. The direct constraints combine leptonic and semileptonic D and D_{s} decays as well as information from neutrinonuclaon scattering and W → cs decays. The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only leptonic D and D_{s} decays with our inputs for lattice averages.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only semileptonic D and D_{s} decays with our inputs for lattice averages.  
Constraints in the (V_{cd},V_{cs}) plane where direct constraints involve only information from neutrinonucleaon scattering and W→ cs decays (no lattice input). 
Constraint from the B^{+}→τ^{+} ν branching ratio:
The recent update of BR(B→τν) from Belle has led to a decrease of the world average. The discrepancy in the CKM global fit between the world averages for sin2β and BR(B→τν) has thus been eased significantly.  
There is a specific correlation between the two quantities in the global fit which is best viewed in the (sin2β,BR(B→τν)) plane, regarding the prediction from the global fit without using these measurements. The cross corresponds to the experimental value with 1 sigma errors.  
The constraint can also be seen from the point of view of lattice inputs, with the predictions on the decay constant f_{Bd} and f_{Bd} Sqrt[B_{Bd}] 
The global CKM fit in the small (ρbar,ηbar) plane (zoom):
Zoomed constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane.The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Zoomed constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. The V_{ub} constraint has been splitted in the two contributions: V_{ub} from inclusive and exclusive semileptonic decays (plain dark green) and V_{ub} from B^{+}→τ^{+} ν (hashed green). The red hashed region of the global combination corresponds to 68% CL. 


Zoomed constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane not including the angle measurements in the global fit. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane including only the angle measurements. 


Constraints from CP conserving quantities (V_{ub} / V_{cb}, Δm_{d}, (Δm_{d} and Δm_{s}) and B^{+} →τ^{+} ν) in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. 


Constraints from CP violating quantities (sin(2β), α, γ and ε_{k}) in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. 


Constraints from "Tree" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane (γ(DK) and α from the isospin analysis with the help of sin2β (charmonium), which gives another tree only γ measurement (the only assumption is that the ΔI=3/2 b>d EW penguin amplitude is negligible)). 


Constraints from "Loop" quantities in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane, not including the braching ratio of B^{+} → τ^{+}ν in the global fit. 


Constraints in the (ρbar,ηbar) plane not including the measurement of sin2β in the global fit. 
